Skip to main content.

Thu, 03 Nov 2011

Work on important problems

A friend pointed me to a transcript of Richard Hamming's motivational speech, "You and your research." In the speech, Hamming (the famous inventor of the Hamming code, an early and vital error-correction algorithm) discusses points that make a researcher generate important results for the field. (I think it was Blake who sent me the link. I seem to have no idea how I found it initially.)

I'll now take a moment and mis-quote Hamming, pretending he's giving advice to activists rather than scientists:

If you do not work on an important problem, it’s unlikely you’ll do important work. It’s perfectly obvious. Great activists have thought through, in a careful way, a number of important problems in their field, and they keep an eye on wondering how to attack them. Let me warn you, ‘important problem’ must be phrased carefully. The three outstanding problems in physics, in a certain sense, were never worked on while I was at Bell Labs. By important I mean guaranteed a Nobel Prize and any sum of money you want to mention. We didn’t work on (1) time travel, (2) teleportation, and (3) antigravity. They are not important problems because we do not have an attack. It’s not the consequence that makes a problem important, it is that you have a reasonable attack. That is what makes a problem important. When I say that most activists don’t work on important problems, I mean it in that sense. The average activist, so far as I can make out, spends almost all his time working on problems which he believes will not be important and he also doesn’t believe that they will lead to important problems.

He tells great stories, and you should read the transcript. Here, however, is a summary of his points:

The Q&A, and the full speech, get the blood pumping. Give it a read.

[] permanent link and comments

Wed, 02 Jun 2010

2008, in summary

Here's an old bit of text that, for some reason, I never posted. It's a review of 2008, from the perspective of Asheesh on the first Saturday night in 2009.

There are some thoughts in here that I had trouble recognizing. Here are some notes that might help you understand what I was talking about:

Somehow this 2008 restrospective fails to mention probably the singularly best thing I did in 2008: I went to Debconf.

And now, some writing from a year and a half ago.

8----< CUT HERE >---8

Two thousand eight

"Saturating the metrics."

Toward the end of 2007 I was worried I had run out of ambitions. All the things I could have named in 2006 that I would have said I wanted, I already had, or I had a clear path to getting. Thinking through it at the time, the list didn't even seem very long.

You could say that from the summer of 2001 up to the middle of 2007, my path was obvious. I would graduate from high school, and I would go to college. I would keep some old friends, and I would have great difficulty with the increasing distance between me and some of them. I would eschew proprietary software. I would be whimsical and earnest, if sometimes melodramatic. I would graduate again and again. I would be in a safe, understandable environment that would provide me outlets for all these things.

Getting out of school takes away that last one. It also takes away a peer group, replacing it with a nebulous concept of friends who suddenly aren't all in the same place of life as you.

"No one's watching"

Around Halloween 2007, I said I felt like no one's watching me. My friends for years aren't around to see what I'm doing, and to tell me if I'm crazy or wrong. All they get to hear is what I tell them. If I don't say what is wrong when they ask, they'll never know to ask again. They won't be surprised at who they see me walking around with because they'll never see me walking around here. "Watching" meant "watching out," like a big brother but not like Big Brother.

That was 2007. In 2008, there still aren't people who see me every single day who know me well enough to tell me firmly that I'm doing something I should not be. But I don't feel the same sort of loneliness as I did a year before. A few really close friends can make a world of a difference for me. I now know enough people here whose struggles and character strengths and flaws are familiar to me; I trust them enough that I'm eager to have mine become familiar to them. It helps that I really believe that these people care about me; it also helps that I think I can see that care in people. They want to know what I'm doing, and they can help me find out how I feel about it. I guess I've learned to smooth over the temporal distance between conversations even with close friends.

One of those people scared me when she told me she might leave San Francisco. I was saddened, and I wanted to tell her all the things I'd miss about her. Before I got a chance to tell her, as I thought about them, I found that I had a lot of the characteristics I liked in her. I guess I really like me, and I would sure miss me if for some reason I found myself missing.

By the middle of the year, I came up with a new metric: not for me, but for my relationships with other people. How much joy do I get, like by sharing a smile or a sigh? And how much does the person drain me, like from the anxiety of waiting or by our repeated failures to communicate? What a perfect year in which to suddenly lose a particular neediness that haunted one friendship.

"They try what they're not"

There were a couple of things that I did this past year that would have seemed pretty unthinkable to me a few years back. One I tried and found it was much more painful than I thought; that taught me a lot. The other was less painful than I had expected, and the absence of pain taught me a different sort of terror. In the end, neither of them showed me I was someone fundamentally different than who I thought I was, but that certainly wasn't the only possible outcome. Somehow these self-experiments of 2008 touched me a lot more deeply than the ones in 2007.

"Anything"

The other sensation I had a year and a half ago, just as I left college to start working, was, "I could do anything." It was overhwelming; suddenly out of college, there was nothing to bind me to anything at all. I could program computers, or I could sell ice cream. The realization came to me as a reflection of learning that while Lawrence Lessig could keep informing the world about copyright, he would ditch that success entirely and start a new crusade.

The overwhelming thing was how empty "anything" was. Let alone a better idea; I couldn't really come up with anything I wanted to do other than what I had been doing. I can still keep sliding forward, I knew, but I felt unprepared to decide what I would do next.

In 2008, I remembered that I like teaching people. I think I should do that more, perhaps in a professional setting. And I have a few ideas for visions of my future self; they require the cooperation of others, so we'll see what they say. But I've seen the visions with enough clarity to know who to ask, so now I'm waiting on something concrete. And rather than just squint at the hazy distant future, some friends helped me gain the self-confidence to apply that to this moment: Of course I should try to teach ninth graders about copyright and Creative Commons. Of course I should try to speak to the anarchists of Baltimore about it, and (this one finally my own idea) of course I should give a tutorial at the yearly PyCon.

Suddenly present this year is a sense that I feel comfortable in my skin. I'm really grateful that some of my friends seem to have found that for themselves this year, too.

[] permanent link and comments

Tue, 01 Jan 2008

Welcome to the new year

What went well in 2007

What went poorly

What I didn't guess would happen

I wonder what 2008 will be like.

This must be it. Welcome to the new year.

[] permanent link and comments